I have become entranced by the “mighty
yellow glow” of my TEI-based project - from beyond the screen it beckoned me
into its strange, golden wild and I gladly obeyed (May 1936, 42). I’m talking, of
course, about The Yellow Nineties Online.
I knew, from out of the corner of my eye, that I had caught a faint glimpse of
its yellow light before, but I was unsure as to where exactly I had encountered
it. Upon further inspection of its luminous facets, I realised that a former professor
of mine, the lovely Marjorie Stone, had pointed me in the direction of the scholarly
work of one of its principle investigators, Lorraine Janzen Kooistra, in the
final year of my undergraduate studies.
According to its introduction, The Yellow Nineties Online “is an open-access electronic resource for the study of avant-garde aesthetic periodicals of the British fin de siècle” (Kooistra and Denissof 2011). More specifically, the project uses “the thirteen-volume Yellow Book (1894-1897) as [the] site’s central focus” because of the its historical significance to the period. The Yellow Book, far removed from the modern directory of the same name, was an innovative, clothbound periodical of the British 1890’s that encompassed both image and text, and ultimately came to be recognized as the “defining object for all that characterized the yellow nineties—from Aestheticism and Decadence to the rise of the “little magazine” to new notions of gender and sexuality.”
| Source: http://www.1890s.ca/HTML.aspx?s=YBV9_all.html |
This
subject matter immediately appealed to me but, without knowing much about XML,
I assumed that the project would keep its code to itself because I tend towards
pessimism and sometimes have difficulty sharing. Much to my surprise, I found
this project to be extremely transparent in regards to its process and its use
of XML. The project’s rationale for marking up both its primary and secondary sources
in XML using the TEI markup language focuses on the facilitation of the “complex
searches these aesthetic objects demand” (“Editorial Principles”). In addition
to explaining its use of XML and sharing its TEI markup with all users, The Yellow Nineties Online also publishes
articles that detail the challenges its research team has encountered while
encoding. There is a genuine honesty about these essays that I find incredibly
endearing and relatable. In Constance Crompton’s essay, "I Still Prefer
Books": Narrating the Gentle Introduction to XML Markup” she admits that,
“[l]ike many coders, [she] learned how to encode in TEI before [she] learned the
rationale and purpose of markup” (2010, 2). As someone who is trying to wrap her head around the same rationale, I thought this was a particularly refreshing confession.
Crompton also discusses the changes to markup detail that the members of The Yellow Nineties Online had to come to terms with. Originally, the team
had an extensively detailed system of tags in mind for their project. In attempts “to do justice to The
Yellow Book’s semantic substance, [the team] tagged place names, geographic
regions, dates, each character’s fictional status, quotation marks, and foreign
words. [They] even imagined a second layer of coding for each document” (5).
However, this intensely nuanced system of tags presented the team with an issue
of accessibility. While these tags were beneficial for some scholars, they ultimately “decreased
the utility of the site for users who wanted to access the full print run of The Yellow Book and the associated
scholarly content” because of the time it took to write them (6). In response to
this issue of accessibility, the team chose to scale back the detail of their
tagging system, thus creating “a site that is useful to digital humanities
experts as well as novices” (8). This honesty and dedication to accessibility
reflects Julia Flanders’ assertion that digital humanists must be “committed to
encoding … data in a standard way so that it can be shared” for years to come, perhaps making The Yellow Nineties Online an example of the “rare” kind of
collaboration Flanders refers to (2012, 74).
I am confident
that this project’s “horizon of usefulness” will remain visible, fiercely emanating
a digital, yellow glow for years to come.
![]() |
| Source: http://www.archive.org/stream/yellowapr189609uoft#page/n69/mode/2up |
References
Crompton, Constance. 2010. "I Still Prefer
Books": Narrating the Gentle Introduction to XML Markup." The
Yellow Nineties Online. Accessed October 11, 2016. http://www.1890s.ca/HTML.aspx?s=Prefer_Books.html.
Flanders,
Julia. 2012. “Collaboration and Dissent: Challenges of Collaborative Standards
for Digital Humanities.” In Collaborative
Research in the Digital Humanities, edited by Marilyn Deegan and
Willard McCarty, 68-80. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Kooistra,
Lorraine Janzen and Dennis Denisoff. 2011. “Welcome to The Yellow Nineties
Online.” The Yellow Nineties Online. Accessed October 11, 2016. http://www.1890s.ca/Default.aspx.
“Editorial Principles.” The Yellow Nineties Online. Accessed
October 11, 2016. http://www.1890s.ca/Editorial_Principles.aspx.
May, John Lewis. 1936. John Lane and the Nineties. London: John Lane The Bodley Head.
May, John Lewis. 1936. John Lane and the Nineties. London: John Lane The Bodley Head.

Note: please excuse the formatting of my last citation - Blogspot will not let me present it correctly for some mysterious reason.
ReplyDeleteI first came across the Yellow Book a few years ago when I studied Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Grey. I was always taken by the Aubrey Beardsley illustrations - amazing stuff.
ReplyDelete(BTW I had issues with the citation formatting too. Maybe I should have encoded it in according to TEI guidleines first...)
I'm ashamed to say I haven't read The Picture of Dorian Grey, but I did some across its relevance to the Yellow Book while researching!
DeleteI love Crompton's confession! I've had a similar experience with XML metadata schemas - I learned how to encode metadata using XML, but couldn't quite wrap my head around the purpose of the schemas until I had worked with it for some time. Perhaps we need to understand 'how' it functions before we understand the 'why'?
ReplyDeleteWasn't it just refreshingly honest? I think that, with many things, the 'how' does often come before the 'why'!
DeleteIt's so interesting that the team had to scale back their tag system! It's very neat to see a real life example of a team needing to make compromises when digitizing something, and also to see a process of revision in a project already in progress.
ReplyDeleteYes! That essay really affirmed that XML is, at its core, a conversation, a compromise.
Delete