The
ownership of digital goods is an interesting concept. When I purchase a
physical book, the connection between me and any publishing actors more or less
ends once I’ve purchased the book. No one will know what pages I read, if the
book sits on my shelf, or if I throw the book in the trash someday. However,
when I purchase, for instance, an iPhone, Apple, along with many other
applications, continues to have access to my device, providing me with software
updates that dictate how I can and cannot use my phone. Digital Rights
Management (DRM) is an example of a system that limits consumer’s access to
e-books, music, DVDS, and more. DRM is applied to artifacts in an attempt to reduce
digital piracy (Maxwell, 2013, p. 37). In the case of ebooks, DRM “prevents owners
[...] from making copies to read on devices that do not support the DRM system”
(Galey, 2012, p. 232/233).
DVDs also have DRM
systems built into their design, prohibiting reproduction of the artifact
(Gillespie, 2006, p. 1). I experienced a barrier of access to my DVDs when I
took a trip to England with my mom in 2010. I brought a handful of DVDs with me
to watch at nigh to relax after a long day of sightseeing. When I put the disc
into the DVD player, the DVD wouldn’t play. At the time, I figured the DVD
player could not support my DVD for some reason, but I wasn’t sure why. DVDs and
DVD players have “Region Playback Control” built into them, which means that the
manufacturers sets geographic limits of where that particular DVD can be played.
For instance, the DVD I buy in Canada can also be played in the U.S., but not
New Zealand, Europe or India (“RPC: Region Playback Control”). Since I
purchased these DVDs, I felt that I should be able to access them wherever I
pleased, but the DVDs software and hardware limited my access based on my
geographic location. Samuelson (2003) discusses the need for a “consumer bill
of rights,” which states “that consumers who legally acquire copyrighted works
should be free to use them in various non-commercial ways, including to time- and
space-shift, make backup copies, use the information on the platform of one’s
choice, and transform copies from one format to another” (p. 45). In this
sense, I should have been able to shift geographically and use any DVD player
in order to play any DVD that I purchased. This shows that “ownership” and “access”
do not have universal definitions and instead the use of owned digital property
is prohibited by various barriers.
One instance that I have felt full access to my purchased
media is by copying vinyl to my computer as MP3 files. My record player has a
USB attachment which allows me to transfer music from my vinyl records to MP3
format. I attempted research on this subject but I couldn’t find a concrete
answer, but I believe that transferring purchased vinyl to MP3 is legal as long
as it is not being distributed and is just for personal use. The main reason I
wanted to transfer albums from vinyl to MP3 was to be able to listen to my
music on my iPod as well. I like having the physical, tactile experience of
vinyl, but I can’t bring my record player to the gym with me and run on the
treadmill – that is where an iPod comes in handy. Having my music in MP3 format
allows me to listen to my music anywhere. In addition, purchasing vinyl ranges
in price, but the albums I purchase are usually around $30 which is much more
expensive than a digital download of the same album. Today, many new vinyl
albums satisfy consumer’s needs and come with a digital download of the album
because the music industry understands it is mainly a digital market. In
reference to Samuelson’s (2003) discussion of the imagined “consumer bill of
rights,” I would be able to “transform copies from one form to another,” with
no legal repercussions since I purchased the media (p. 45).
I found a quote by Maxwell
(2013) in “Ebook logic: We can do better” very interesting. He says that DRM
systems applied to ebooks means that they are more leased to consumers than
owned (p. 38). To me, this brings up the question, should the fact that you
purchased media mean that it is yours to do whatever you want with? Does this
differ between physical and digital objects? I believe that the digital world and
technology provides a space for illegal activity and piracy of digital objects,
and institutions and organizations are franticly trying to keep up and protect
themselves and their artifacts. However, I hope the nature of ownership in the
digital world continues to evolve until there is a more equal balance between
user and corporate rights.
References
Galey, Alan. “The Enkindling Reciter: E-Books in the
Bibliographical Imagination.” Book History 15 (2012): 210-47.
Gillespie, Tartelon. “Designed to ‘Effectively Frustrate’: Copyright, Technology, and the Agency of Users.” New Media & Society 8, no. 4 (2006): 651-669.
Maxwell, John W. "E-Book
Logic: We Can Do Better." Papers of the
Bibliographical Society of Canada 51,
no. 1 (2013): 29-47.
Samuelson, Pamela. (2003). “Digital Rights
Management {and, or, vs.} the Law.” Communications
of the ACM 46, no. 4 (2003): 41-45.
“RPC (Region Playback Control.” Tech-FAQ. Retrieved on November 7, 2016. http://www.tech-faq.com/rpc-regional-playback-control.html
Woah, I had no idea “Region Playback Control” was a thing! The concept of setting "geographic limits" into a DVD sounds a bit ridiculous. I honestly can't see why you would need these - definitely on Samuelson's level insofar as I think, if you've legally aquired copyrighted works, you should be able "to use them in various non-commercial ways, including to time- and space-shift."
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't have known either if I hadn't brought those DVDs on my trip! I agree with you - since it's the exact same movie, and was acquired legally, I should be able to play it wherever I want. Instead, hardware and software restrict me from doing so. I know piracy is a main concern for media owners, but I wonder if these methods actually prevent privacy.
DeleteThis is actually so funny. My dad and I sat down the other night to watch our favourite modern zombie movie - Dawn of the Dead (2004). We've had our copy for years but it was only until last night that I noticed the disk has what appears to be Indonesian writing on its front? Similarly, when it directs you to the menu screen it first gives you language options - Indonesian or English. There is no Indonesian on the outer jacket of the DVD or the case. It's so weird! How did I not notice this before and what is going on? Is it an Indonesian-specific copy? Is it a weird bootleg? Either way, definitely had me thinking about your response!
DeleteThat's so strange! Do you remember where you bought it from? Maybe the DVD inside was put into a different jacket to sell it to customers without them knowing it was a copy from a different country? I'm not too sure, but I probably wouldn't have noticed either. I mainly look at the DVD jacket, and never pay much attention to what's written on the disc.
DeleteI've also been meaning to watch Dawn of the Dead for a while now - I've heard great things!
I have a feeling this is the case. Oh my gosh, watch it - the zombies are lightning fast, which makes them WAY scarier.
DeleteI have a good few UK DVDs (Region 2?) and I had a multi region player to play them. I spent a long time trying to find one, looking at high-end models until someone told me to buy a cheap, non-recognizable branded player for $30 - it played everything.
ReplyDeleteThen the remote broke...
Because region-switching is not a usual function for a DVD player, that button is missing from all "universal remotes," so now the player is stuck in the north american region :(
I didn't know there were multi region players! That device would be convenient if you moved frequently to different countries around the world. That's too bad to hear about the remote though - another piece of technology inhibiting your agency to watch your owned movies!
ReplyDelete